06 Sep When Are Focus Groups and Individual Interviews Needed?
By :
Liz Steinhauser, PhD – Analytics Manager, HRTec
Richard Young – Customer Success Coach, HRTec
In today’s competitive business landscape, the voice of the employee is more crucial than ever. While employee experience surveys are excellent tools for gathering valuable insights, their true impact lies in how organizations act on the feedback. Often, follow-up actions such as focus groups or individual interviews are necessary to inform effective action plans. This blog explores the strengths of using a mixed-method approach for organizational assessments and identifies when follow-up methods like focus groups and individual interviews are essential and when they might not be necessary.
Strengths of Using Multiple Methods to Assess Climate
Using a blended approach to climate assessment leverages the strengths of each method, compensating for their weaknesses. Surveys provide broad data, while focus groups and individual interviews offer depth and flexibility, allowing for the exploration of issues in greater detail. According to Ehrhart, Schneider, and Macey (2014), this approach results in a more accurate depiction of climate and more actionable results.
- Flexibility and Depth: Interviews and focus groups allow for the examination of multiple topics and provide opportunities to ask additional questions based on survey results.
- Involvement and Commitment: These methods foster a greater sense of involvement and commitment among participants, leading to more honest and direct answers.
- Clarity and Understanding: Skilled interviewers can help respondents understand questions better, reducing the chance of misunderstandings.
- Stimulated Participation: Hearing others’ experiences in a focus group can stimulate participation and recall, enriching the discussion.
- Representation of Demographic Subgroups: Following up with demographic subgroups underrepresented in survey results ensures that all voices are heard.
- Elaborated Responses: Group interaction in focus groups often leads to elaborated responses and shared ideas, including proposed solutions.
For more information on how HRTec can assist you in your follow-up efforts, visit: Focus Groups / Interviews
When to Follow-Up on Employee Experience Survey Results
Knowing when to follow up with additional methods like focus groups or individual interviews is crucial for effective action. Sometimes, survey results are clear-cut, and immediate actions can be taken without further inquiry. Here are scenarios where follow-up is essential and when it might be unnecessary:
1. Ambiguous or Conflicting Feedback.
- Scenario: Survey results indicate conflicting opinions or ambiguous feedback that isn’t straightforward.
- Action: Use focus groups or individual interviews to clarify and understand the underlying issues.
2. Complex Issues.
- Scenario: The survey highlights complex issues that require deeper understanding, such as cultural problems or systemic issues.
- Action: Engage in focus groups to explore these complexities and gather detailed insights.
3. Sensitive Topics.
- Scenario: Feedback touches on sensitive or personal issues that employees may not fully express in a survey.
- Action: Conduct individual interviews to provide a safe space for employees to share their thoughts and experiences in detail. Ensure that participation in these interviews is voluntary and consider hiring an external agency to conduct these interviews.
4. Diverse Perspectives Needed.
- Scenario: The organization needs to understand how different groups within the company feel about specific issues.
- Action: Focus groups can bring together diverse perspectives, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the issue.
5. Low Response Rates.
- Scenario: The survey has a low response rate, raising concerns about the representativeness of the feedback.
- Action: Follow up with targeted focus groups or interviews to gather more comprehensive data.
6. Action Validation.
- Scenario: Before implementing significant changes based on survey results, the organization wants to validate the proposed actions.
- Action: Use focus groups to discuss potential solutions and gather employee input to ensure the actions will be effective.
1. Clear-Cut Results.
- Scenario: Survey results are clear and provide specific, actionable insights without ambiguity.
- Action: Proceed with implementing the identified actions directly, ensuring transparent communication with employees about the steps being taken.
2. High Agreement.
- Scenario: There is a high level of agreement among respondents on specific issues or suggestions.
- Action: Implement the agreed-upon actions and monitor their impact over time, using subsequent surveys to assess effectiveness.
3. Minor Issues.
- Scenario: The feedback pertains to minor issues that can be addressed quickly and easily without further investigation.
- Action: Take immediate action on these issues and communicate the changes to employees, demonstrating responsiveness.
4. Routine Feedback.
- Scenario: The feedback aligns with routine, ongoing improvements already in the pipeline.
- Action: Integrate the survey results into the existing improvement processes and keep employees informed about progress.
Choosing the Right Follow-Up Method
When deciding between focus groups and individual interviews, several factors should be considered to ensure the follow-up process is effective and appropriate for your organization’s needs.
1. Survey Results
Broad Feedback vs. Specific Issues:
- Broad Feedback: If the survey results reveal general themes or widespread issues that affect multiple departments or employee groups, focus groups are often more effective. Focus groups allow for dynamic discussions where participants can build on each other’s ideas, leading to a richer understanding of the themes and potential solutions. For example, if the survey highlights a general concern about workplace communication, a focus group can explore different aspects of communication breakdowns and collectively brainstorm improvements.
- Specific or Sensitive Issues: For more specific or sensitive feedback, individual interviews are usually more appropriate. Individual interviews provide a confidential setting where employees may feel more comfortable discussing personal or sensitive topics, such as experiences of discrimination or harassment. This method allows for deeper exploration of the issue without the influence of group dynamics, ensuring that each participant’s voice is heard in detail.
2. Organizational Size
Larger Organizations:
- Focus Groups: In larger organizations, managing numerous individual interviews can be resource intensive. Focus groups can be a more efficient way to gather diverse perspectives across various departments or locations. They enable HR professionals to engage with a larger number of employees in a shorter time frame, facilitating a broader understanding of organizational issues.
Smaller Organizations:
- Individual Interviews: Smaller organizations may benefit more from the depth provided by individual interviews. With fewer employees, it’s feasible to conduct detailed one-on-one discussions, ensuring that each individual’s perspective is thoroughly understood. This approach can also foster a more personalized and trust-building interaction between employees and HR.
3. Resources Available
Time, Budget, and Personnel:
- Time Constraints: The urgency of addressing the survey results can influence the choice of method. If quick action is needed, focus groups might be preferred due to their ability to gather multiple viewpoints simultaneously. However, if the issues require thorough exploration, investing time in individual interviews may be more beneficial.
- Budget Considerations: Budget limitations can also dictate the follow-up method. Focus groups can be cost-effective as they involve fewer sessions compared to numerous individual interviews. However, for highly sensitive issues, the investment in individual interviews, possibly facilitated by an external agency, can be justified by the depth and quality of insights obtained.
- Personnel Resources: The availability of trained facilitators and interviewers is crucial. Focus groups require skilled moderators to manage group dynamics and ensure productive discussions. Individual interviews demand experienced interviewers who can build rapport and probe deeper into sensitive topics. If internal resources are limited, outsourcing to an external agency might be necessary.
Conclusion
Effective follow-up on employee experience surveys using focus groups and individual interviews can enhance employee engagement and organizational culture. By following these best practices, HR professionals can ensure they gather valuable insights and take meaningful actions that make a real difference.
For more organizational assessment tips, visit our Resource Center.
Additional Reading:
References:
Ehrhart, M. G., Schneider, B., & Macey, W. H. (2014). Organizational climate and culture: An introduction to theory, research, and practice. New York, NY. Routledge.
Learn More About HRTec’s Organizational Surveys
Reach out to us to see how HRTec can help you drive higher performance and organizational effectiveness.
